White Plains, NY – A federal court has ruled that Westchester County, New York, violated the First Amendment rights of pro-life sidewalk counselors, marking a significant victory for free speech in a legal challenge brought by Thomas More Society attorneys. The decision in Hulinsky v. County of Westchester found the County liable for enacting an unconstitutional provision in its 2022 “Reproductive Health Care Facilities Access Act,” or Chapter 425, which restricted peaceful pro-life advocacy near abortion facilities.

The decision awards plaintiffs Oksana Hulinsky and Regina Molinelli nominal damages for the chilling of their life-saving sidewalk counseling for over two-and-half years as a result of the unconstitutional law, even though the County attempted to avoid liability by repealing the offending provision earlier this year.  

This ruling builds on a March 14 decision that rejected the County’s attempt to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims against part of Chapter 425 prohibiting so-called “interference” with abortion access “by deceptive means or otherwise”—a sweeping and unprecedented restriction adopted as part of the County’s furor over the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. The Court rightly held the provision “criminalized large swaths of protected speech” on pain of jail, fines, and civil liability, flagrantly violating the First Amendment.  

“This ruling sends a powerful message to municipalities nationwide: vague laws targeting pro-life speech will not stand,” said Christopher Ferrara, Senior Counsel at Thomas More Society. “Westchester County’s pro-life sidewalk counselors seek only to offer compassionate, life-affirming alternatives on public sidewalks—as is their First Amendment right. Westchester’s arrogant overreach tried to silence their voices, but this decision helps reaffirm their constitutional freedom to share the pro-life message.”

Hulinsky v. County of Westchester was filed by Thomas More Society attorneys in August 2022 after the County enacted Chapter 425, which imposed a litany of severe restrictions on speech and assembly near abortion facilities, intending to restrict pro-life sidewalk counseling ministries in public spaces. The County has since repealed or amended a number of those provisions in response to the Thomas More Society lawsuit. But the latest decision ensures that Westchester County must pay nominal damages and potentially significant attorney fees for violating Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights for nearly three years.  

“Nobody should be sent to jail and forced to pay significant fines simply for handing out pro-life leaflets and talking peacefully to women about abortion alternatives on public sidewalks,” said Michael McHale, Senior Counsel at Thomas More Society. “Yet, Westchester County’s vague ban on so-called ‘interference’ with abortion access threatened to do exactly that, in blatant violation of the First Amendment, as the Court recognized.”

However, Thomas More Society intends to appeal the Court’s prior decision upholding Chapter 425’s prohibition on “following-and-harassing,” which the law vaguely defines as ignoring an “implied request to cease” on a public sidewalk.

“This decision sets a precedent that rogue governments may not recklessly trample on the fundamental rights of peaceful pro-life sidewalk counselors and then attempt to run and hide at the first sign of an adverse court judgment—a common tactic wielded against pro-lifers,” McHale said. “We look forward to pursuing significant attorney fees against Westchester County for violating our clients’ rights and in continuing to eradicate similarly unconstitutional restrictions on pro-life speech in courts across the country.”  

Read the Order from the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York in Hulinsky v. County of Westchester, here.

Additional Information:

Order and Decision Partially Granting and Partially Denying Summary Judgment (March 14, 2025)

First Amended Verified Complaint (November 24, 2022)