Mirabelli v. Bonta
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
In a landmark 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that California's secret gender transition policies in schools violate parents' constitutional rights — delivering the most significant parental rights ruling in a generation.
[These] policies cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.
Mirabelli v. Bonta, Per Curiam
The Court rejected California’s premise that the state knows better than parents, affirming that it is parents—not bureaucrats—who are the primary protectors of their children.

THE RULING
What the Court decided
The U.S. Supreme Court granted Thomas More Society’s emergency application in Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026), and held in a 6-3 per curiam opinion that California’s Parental Exclusion Policies—which forced teachers to hide children’s gender transitions from parents during school hours—likely violate parents’ rights under both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Building on its holding in Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025), where the Court applied strict scrutiny when a school district refused to let parents opt out of LGBTQ+ storybooks, the Court found that California’s “intrusion on parents’ free exercise rights—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ storybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in Mahmoud.”
The ruling restored the class-wide permanent injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez, protecting a statewide class of parents opposed to California’s Parental Exclusion Policies. The Court rejected arguments against class certification, finding it was likely proper—ensuring the restored injunction applies statewide.
The case began in 2023, when Thomas More Society filed a federal lawsuit for two teachers—Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West—who stood up against California’s state-enforced Parental Exclusion Policies. After securing a preliminary injunction in September 2023, the case evolved into a civil rights class action that included teachers and parents harmed by these unconstitutional policies. After Judge Benitez entered a class-wide permanent injunction, California appealed. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in March 2026, the injunction protecting parents remains in effect.

Parents—not the State—have primary authority with respect to ‘the upbringing and education of children.’
Mirabelli v. Bonta, Per Curiam
Drawing on a century of established precedent, the Court reaffirmed the bedrock constitutional principle that the right to raise one’s children belongs to parents, not the government. With this decision, the Court brings longstanding precedent into the 21st century, reshaping and strengthening the legal landscape for parental rights.

CASE TIMELINE
Our path to the Supreme Court
From two teachers in Escondido, California, to a landmark Supreme Court victory.
CASE TIMELINE
Our path to the Supreme Court
From two teachers in Escondido, California, to a landmark Supreme Court victory.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
Date
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.
PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS
The Court has spoken. Now it’s time to act.
Thomas More Society is enforcing the Mirabelli decision across the country by taking legal action and giving parents the tools to protect their families today.
Your district won’t comply? We’ll take action.
Assert your rights at your child’s school
I have no doubt that parents have rights, even though unenumerated, concerning their children and the life choices they make.
Justice Kagan, dissenting
Even the dissent could not dispute the core right at issue. When even the dissent concedes the fundamental principle, the ruling stands on firm footing.


With You From the Sidewalk to the Courtroom
Since our very first case, NOW v. Scheidler, we have steadfastly supported our nation’s pro-life champions. We have fought against coercion and intimidation—all the way to the Supreme Court—and have emerged victorious. As a leading pro-life law firm, we have established the groundwork for you to protest the grave injustice of abortion wherever it occurs. If your right to advocate for your beliefs is ever violated, we are the foremost and most reliable resource to call upon.
Additionally, we have successfully represented clients who object to providing abortion-related medical coverage because of their religious convictions, as well as those who oppose the unlawful use of taxpayer funds for abortion.

Get Legal Aid
Featured Cases
Things You Need to Know
First and foremost, comply immediately with their directives. You do not want to expose yourself or your cause to unnecessary risks. Following that, contact Thomas More Society.
Fill out and submit the pro-life legal aid form promptly. Ensure you include as many relevant details of the case as possible.
Not every case requires litigation. In fact, most don’t. We will collaborate with you to determine the most effective way to protect your rights and resolve the issue at hand.
We prioritize assisting anyone with a clear and compelling case. Our areas of expertise include:
- Challenging unfair bubble and buffer zone laws
- Defending students from biased school policies
- Guiding clients through local sign ordinances
- Aiding clients with damaged or stolen property
- Representing clients harassed for pro-life work
- Representing clients seeking religious exemptions for providing abortion or contraceptive medical coverage
- Supporting clients with sincere religious objections to vaccine requirements that involve the use of aborted fetal tissue
Get help form headline
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.



-2.webp)





