Mirabelli v. Bonta

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

In a landmark 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that California's secret gender transition policies in schools violate parents' constitutional rights — delivering the most significant parental rights ruling in a generation.

[These] policies cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.

Mirabelli v. Bonta, Per Curiam

The Court rejected California’s premise that the state knows better than parents, affirming that it is parents—not bureaucrats—who are the primary protectors of their children.

THE RULING

What the Court decided

The U.S. Supreme Court granted Thomas More Society’s emergency application in Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026), and held in a 6-3 per curiam opinion that California’s Parental Exclusion Policies—which forced teachers to hide children’s gender transitions from parents during school hours—likely violate parents’ rights under both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Building on its holding in Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025), where the Court applied strict scrutiny when a school district refused to let parents opt out of LGBTQ+ storybooks, the Court found that California’s “intrusion on parents’ free exercise rights—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ storybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in Mahmoud.”

The ruling restored the class-wide permanent injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez, protecting a statewide class of parents opposed to California’s Parental Exclusion Policies. The Court rejected arguments against class certification, finding it was likely proper—ensuring the restored injunction applies statewide.

The case began in 2023, when Thomas More Society filed a federal lawsuit for two teachers—Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West—who stood up against California’s state-enforced Parental Exclusion Policies. After securing a preliminary injunction in September 2023, the case evolved into a civil rights class action that included teachers and parents harmed by these unconstitutional policies. After Judge Benitez entered a class-wide permanent injunction, California appealed. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in March 2026, the injunction protecting parents remains in effect.

Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West, the California teachers who started it all.

Parents—not the State—have primary authority with respect to ‘the upbringing and education of children.’

Mirabelli v. Bonta, Per Curiam

Drawing on a century of established precedent, the Court reaffirmed the bedrock constitutional principle that the right to raise one’s children belongs to parents, not the government. With this decision, the Court brings longstanding precedent into the 21st century, reshaping and strengthening the legal landscape for parental rights.

CASE TIMELINE

Our path to the Supreme Court

From two teachers in Escondido, California, to a landmark Supreme Court victory.

CASE TIMELINE

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

CASE TIMELINE

Our path to the Supreme Court

From two teachers in Escondido, California, to a landmark Supreme Court victory.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Date

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS

The Court has spoken. Now it’s time to act.

Thomas More Society is enforcing the Mirabelli decision across the country by taking legal action and giving parents the tools to protect their families today.

Your district won’t comply? We’ll take action.

Thomas More Society is sending demand letters to school districts nationwide that maintain secrecy policies in defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling. If your district or state has Parental Exclusion Policies, please contact us. Districts that refuse to rescind or revise their policies will face federal court litigation—including injunctions, damages, and attorney’s fees.

Assert your rights at your child’s school

Download the opt-out letter template invoking the Mirabelli decision. Fill in your details, print, sign, and deliver to your school’s administration.

I have no doubt that parents have rights, even though unenumerated, concerning their children and the life choices they make.

Justice Kagan, dissenting

Even the dissent could not dispute the core right at issue. When even the dissent concedes the fundamental principle, the ruling stands on firm footing.

With You From the Sidewalk to the Courtroom

Since our very first case, NOW v. Scheidler, we have steadfastly supported our nation’s pro-life champions. We have fought against coercion and intimidation—all the way to the Supreme Court—and have emerged victorious. As a leading pro-life law firm, we have established the groundwork for you to protest the grave injustice of abortion wherever it occurs. If your right to advocate for your beliefs is ever violated, we are the foremost and most reliable resource to call upon.

Additionally, we have successfully represented clients who object to providing abortion-related medical coverage because of their religious convictions, as well as those who oppose the unlawful use of taxpayer funds for abortion.

Things You Need to Know

How should I respond if law enforcement approaches me?

First and foremost, comply immediately with their directives. You do not want to expose yourself or your cause to unnecessary risks. Following that, contact Thomas More Society.

What’s the best way to request help from you?

Fill out and submit the pro-life legal aid form promptly. Ensure you include as many relevant details of the case as possible.

Will I need to appear in court?

Not every case requires litigation. In fact, most don’t. We will collaborate with you to determine the most effective way to protect your rights and resolve the issue at hand.

What pro-life legal issues can you help me with?

We prioritize assisting anyone with a clear and compelling case. Our areas of expertise include:

  • Challenging unfair bubble and buffer zone laws
  • Defending students from biased school policies
  • Guiding clients through local sign ordinances
  • Aiding clients with damaged or stolen property
  • Representing clients harassed for pro-life work
  • Representing clients seeking religious exemptions for providing abortion or contraceptive medical coverage
  • Supporting clients with sincere religious objections to vaccine requirements that involve the use of aborted fetal tissue

Pro-Life Cases

No results found.
There are no results with this criteria. Try changing your search.
Tagline

Get help form headline

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

Legal Help Form Accordion